Egyptian mummy reconstructions.

I’m in an Egyptian mood this week.

There have been a few reconstructions of Egyptian mummies, and I’ve done my best to track them all down.

Lets start with the really big names first.

Ramses II

This is a slightly incorrect reconstruction, as the very elderly king (in his nineties) had his hair hennaed to a light auburn colour to make him look younger. It’s also likely, since he was a natural red head (and of Libyan descent) that his skin tone was a few shades lighter, as nobles wouldn’t have gone out in the sun much.


The Mummy of King Tutanhkamun was carefully placed in a cat scanner, and an image made of his skull, created without damaging him.They gave a model of the skull to three teams, one American, one Egyptian and one French. They then let them all use their varying techniques. This very lifelike one is the French reconstruction with a silicon skin.

These computer rendered images also support the French reconstruction. The grey one is the American one, and they were working blind on it. They identified it as a Caucasian North African, and after taking a little time to decide the sex (as he had a very feminine skull) they come up with the very weak chinned young man you see here. The jawline on the Egyptian one is somewhat stronger (suspiciously so). I think they may have ‘butched him up’ a touch.


First of all I’d like to say that this looks absolutely nothing like the bust of her. The busts of Nefertiti all have much thinner lips and the face is less angular with rounder cheekbones, and the shape of the eyebrows is totally wrong. The skin tone is also well off the skin colour of the bust, she’s a should be a much pinker tone. But, it may well be an accurate representation of the mummy it’s of, as the identity of Nefertiti is up for debate. I think the fact that this recon doesn’t look anything like the bust suggests it’s not Nefertiti they’ve got their hands on here.


Asru was a chantress (temple singer) of fifty or sixty years old. When she died she appeared to have been in poor health for quite some time, suffering a slipped disc, ear infection and a cyst due to a parasitic infection that would have caused shortness of breath and chest pain. She also suffered from schistosomiasis. 


This man dates from the twenty second or twenty third dynasty, about 945–715 BC. There’s a link to the reconstruction process here.

 Pesed and ‘Bess’

Pesed was a fifty five to seventy year old woman from 300 BC, who lived in Akhmim.

‘Bess’ was five feet tall and died between 25 and 35. She was likely from a wealthy family and died died 3,000 to 3,500 years ago. She was modeled by high-resolution CT scans, which captured detailed visual slices every millimeter.

Nefer-ii-ne and Natsef Amun

Nefer-ii-ne dates to around 250 BC. She looks a lot like like a Nigerian comedienne you see on British TV, and appears to be fairly prognathic, so I’m guessing she had pretty dark skin, as does the man next to her…

Natsef Amun was a priest at the temple of Karnak from 1,100 BC. He died in middle age. He appears to be strongly Nubian in appearance, which isn’t uncommon in Upper (Southern) Egyptians


Recently reconstructed by the British museum. He died about 800 BC. There’s a link to the Museum article on the reconstruction here. If you think the cat scan image is a bit odd, it’s because he’s wearing a bowl on his head. Apparently as part of the mummification process.

Ta-irty bai

Reconstructed from a CT scan by the Akhmim Mummy Studies Consortium. She dates to the 3rd century BC. She was aged 35 to 40 when she died, about the average for ancient Egypt.

‘Annie’ and Peten-Amun

This is the body of an unnamed teenage girl from Akhmim circa 250 BC.

Peten-Amun was a minor priest from the early Ptolemaic era (300 BC) who died aged about sixty, a long life by Egyptian standards.

Bodiless mummy head

Digitally reconstructed. You can see his grey beard and thin hair more clearly on the mummy though. 

28 responses to “Egyptian mummy reconstructions.

  1. Hi mathilda I ws not aware that Rames II line came from Lybia. I knew they were not of the older Royal but worked up through the milatary and took over after the colaspe of the last of the 18th dynasty( the Atenist like Ankenanten, Tut).That would explain how other tenth century pharos rose to power that
    were also of lybian decent.

  2. The boll on top of Nesperennub’s head seems to have been used as part of the embalming process.
    Also it intresting that Ramses was lybian descent since he led campians againts lybians.

  3. I think Ramses lead campaigns against everyone.

  4. True Ramses did do that. and most certanly if you were in the levant and sided with the Hittites.Though the fact there were lybian groups like the Libu that raided egypt give us any sign what the social structe was in lybia? Was there any stucture at all as we see in egypt or was it all nomadic?
    Possible that the Ramseihed family had maintianed no relations with lybia and saw lybia as an other nation.

  5. True any nation was part of his campians. It seems as thought the Ramseshide family did not maintian any relations with the old country though.
    However the fact lybians like the Libu had become raiders of egypt rais quetions how structured Lybia was. Were they nomads through out egyptian histrory or did they have some organsation beyond tribal.

  6. Yes the lead campians against any nation.The
    fact though there were lybians like the libu
    leading raids against egypt raises questions about their level of organsitation. Did the
    Lybians ever have any level of nation unity or were they allways tribal?

  7. Yes Ramses lead campians against any nation.The fact though there were lybians like the libu leading raids against egypt raises questions about their level of organsitation. Did Lybia ever have any level of nation unity or were they allways tribal?

  8. Neferdit is very very beautiful lowee

  9. Hello!
    I’m Bernadette from Hungary, a graphician working in a museum. I tried to draw a facial reconstruction about Ramessses the II, using my own sketches taken in Cairo. I search for any reconstructions still exists but i also know only the Manchester’s one.
    may you know an other reconstruction is still exists?
    I heard about a japanese team, they did and also presented a reco’ using the X-rays were taken by Professor Faure, but they didn’t accessible.

    Thank you
    Kind regards
    Bernadette Andics Hungary

  10. Well, I”m totally fascinated with your site. I’ve been interested in Egyptian art since the early seventies and find your site noteworthy.

  11. king tut was not white,he was black. you could see .

    • yes you’re right mace…the original king tut reconstruction done many years ago…shows him as black..and Susan Anton…one of the anthropologists who worked on the second, much more famous reconstruction of him (she operated blindly, meaning she originally didn’t know whose crania it was)), said that his skull exhibited many “typical African features”…

      • Susan Anton actually said that he could have been lighter in colour, and that she was fine with the details of the reconstruction. I have it on the blog somewhere. AHAH>

        Dear name withheld,, (Ausur) Thanks for your email. I actually didn’t choose the term “North
        African Caucasoid” that is the term used by another team (there were three that
        worked on separate reconstructions). The French team was responsible
        for the reconstruction that was on the cover of National Geographic
        Magazine and they also used that term.

        Our team, myself and Michael Anderson of Yale, were the ones that did
        the plaster reconstruction without knowledge of whose skull we were
        working on. I did the biological profile (assessment of age at death,
        sex and ancestry), Michael made the actual reconstruction. Based on
        the physical characters of the skull, I concluded that this was the skull
        of a male older than 15 but less than 21, and likely in the 18-20 year
        range and of African ancestry, possibly north african
        . The possibly
        north african came mostly from the shape of the face including the
        narrow nose opening, that is not entirely consistent with an ‘African’
        designation. A narrow nose is more typical of more northerly located
        populations because nose breadth is thought to be at least in part
        related to the climate in which ancestral populations lived. A narrow
        and tall nose is seen most frequently in Europeans. Tut’s head was a
        bit of a conundrum, but, as you note, there is a huge range of
        variation in modern humans from any area, so for me the skull overall, including
        aspects of the face, spoke fairly strongly of his African origins – the
        nose was a bit unusual. Because their is latitudinal variation in
        several aspects of the skull (including nose size/shape), the
        narrowness of the nose suggested that he might be from a northerly group. This is
        also, I presume, what the French focussed on. I have not been in
        direct contact with the French group, but my understanding is that by their
        definition of ‘caucasoid’ they include Peoples from North Africa,
        Peoples from Western Asia (and the Caucasus, from where the term
        derives), and European peoples. So I don’t think that they were
        referring to a specific set of those peoples. I personally don’t find
        that term all that useful and so I don’t use it. That it was
        attributed to me by the media is an incorrect attribution on their part. I also
        never said he had a European nose, although I am sure I did say that
        the narrow nose was what led me to suggest North Africa as a possibility
        and that a narrow nose is more typically seen in Europe. Not a great
        sound-bit that, so I guess it gets shortened to European nose.

        As you also note, skin color today in North Africa can range from much
        lighter than what they chose to much darker. And we don’t know how
        well today’s range matches that of the past, although I suspect there
        was also a range of variation in the past, as is normal for any
        biological population. Michael’s reconstruction did not include an
        inference of skin color (or eye color), the French team’s did and their
        inference was, I understand, based on a ‘average’ skin tone for Egypt
        today. I don’t know the specifics of how they did that. I think,
        however, it would have been as accurate to have had the same facial
        reconstruction with either a lighter tone or a darker tone to the skin.

        That said, skin and eye color will always be an inference.

        I hope that helps explain.

        Susan C. Antón
        Joint Editor, Journal of Human Evolution
        Director, MA Program in Human Skeletal Biology
        Associate Professor, Center for the Study of Human Origins
        Department of Anthropology NYU
        25 Waverly Place,
        New York, NY 10003

        You are mistaking ‘African’ for ‘black African’ John. Egyptians are an African populaiton, and have been for about the last 8k.

    • this is pure disgusting btw:O
      GADS …………………………………………………….

  12. Thanks for stating that the reconstructed face if the unknown mummy is emphatically NOT Nefertitti! I just watched that show and I swore out loud it didn’t the least resemble the bust also

  13. this is pure disgusting btw:O


  15. I don’t mean to be picky but you left out some really important pharaohs of all time like : Hatshepsut, Khufu, and Senusret. I only said this b/c I’m 14 and have a whole quarter of school on this stuff and a bunch of my friends wanted to know if any of them were on this website, but they weren’t (plus I want to major of social studies when i get older and I thought they were important) ~KJ

  16. and by the way King Tut was white, he was not black I did a 7 page essay on him, and my mom’s professor in collage help me out.

  17. Referring to the reconstruction of Tutankamun above, silicon is a mineral element; silicone is a synthetic polymer.

  18. Mathilda, why do you say that Ramses the Great was of Libyan descent? I’ve never heard this before.

    • Mathilda, why do you say that Ramses the Great was of Libyan descent?

      His dynasty was originally the reultt of Libyan settlers in Egypt.

  19. wow! im doing a school report about Ramesses II. Did i spell it right? scary, but cool pictures!

  20. Its great and it showed me some of the kings and queens (pharoahs) of Egypt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s